fix(gateway): require pairing for unpaired operator device auth
This commit is contained in:
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Docs: https://docs.openclaw.ai
|
||||
- Security/Gateway: harden `agents.files` path handling to block out-of-workspace symlink targets for `agents.files.get`/`agents.files.set`, keep in-workspace symlink targets supported, and add gateway regression coverage for both blocked escapes and allowed in-workspace symlinks. Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
|
||||
- Gateway/Message media roots: thread `agentId` through gateway `send` RPC and prefer explicit `agentId` over session/default resolution so non-default agent workspace media sends no longer fail with `LocalMediaAccessError`; added regression coverage for agent precedence and blank-agent fallback. (#23249) Thanks @Sid-Qin.
|
||||
- Cron/Model overrides: when isolated `payload.model` is no longer allowlisted, fall back to default model selection instead of failing the job, while still returning explicit errors for invalid model strings. (#26717) Thanks @Youyou972.
|
||||
- Security/Gateway auth: require pairing for operator device-identity sessions authenticated with shared token auth so unpaired devices cannot self-assign operator scopes. Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.
|
||||
- Security/Nextcloud Talk: reject unsigned webhook traffic before full body reads, reducing unauthenticated request-body exposure, with auth-order regression coverage. (#26118) Thanks @bmendonca3.
|
||||
- Security/Nextcloud Talk: stop treating DM pairing-store entries as group allowlist senders, so group authorization remains bounded to configured group allowlists. (#26116) Thanks @bmendonca3.
|
||||
- Security/IRC: keep pairing-store approvals DM-only and out of IRC group allowlist authorization, with policy regression tests for allowlist resolution. (#26112) Thanks @bmendonca3.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@ describe("gateway server auth/connect", () => {
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("skips pairing for operator scope upgrades when shared token auth is valid", async () => {
|
||||
test("requires pairing for remote operator device identity with shared token auth", async () => {
|
||||
const { mkdtemp } = await import("node:fs/promises");
|
||||
const { tmpdir } = await import("node:os");
|
||||
const { join } = await import("node:path");
|
||||
@@ -1102,21 +1102,29 @@ describe("gateway server auth/connect", () => {
|
||||
nonce,
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
const initialNonce = await readConnectChallengeNonce(ws);
|
||||
const initial = await connectReq(ws, {
|
||||
ws.close();
|
||||
|
||||
const wsRemoteRead = await openWs(port, { host: "gateway.example" });
|
||||
const initialNonce = await readConnectChallengeNonce(wsRemoteRead);
|
||||
const initial = await connectReq(wsRemoteRead, {
|
||||
token: "secret",
|
||||
scopes: ["operator.read"],
|
||||
client,
|
||||
device: buildDevice(["operator.read"], initialNonce),
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(initial.ok).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(initial.ok).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(initial.error?.message ?? "").toContain("pairing required");
|
||||
let pairing = await listDevicePairing();
|
||||
expect(pairing.pending.filter((entry) => entry.deviceId === identity.deviceId)).toEqual([]);
|
||||
const pendingAfterRead = pairing.pending.filter(
|
||||
(entry) => entry.deviceId === identity.deviceId,
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(pendingAfterRead).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(pendingAfterRead[0]?.role).toBe("operator");
|
||||
expect(pendingAfterRead[0]?.scopes ?? []).toContain("operator.read");
|
||||
expect(await getPairedDevice(identity.deviceId)).toBeNull();
|
||||
wsRemoteRead.close();
|
||||
|
||||
ws.close();
|
||||
|
||||
const ws2 = await openWs(port);
|
||||
const ws2 = await openWs(port, { host: "gateway.example" });
|
||||
const nonce2 = await readConnectChallengeNonce(ws2);
|
||||
const res = await connectReq(ws2, {
|
||||
token: "secret",
|
||||
@@ -1124,9 +1132,16 @@ describe("gateway server auth/connect", () => {
|
||||
client,
|
||||
device: buildDevice(["operator.admin"], nonce2),
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(res.ok).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(res.ok).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(res.error?.message ?? "").toContain("pairing required");
|
||||
pairing = await listDevicePairing();
|
||||
expect(pairing.pending.filter((entry) => entry.deviceId === identity.deviceId)).toEqual([]);
|
||||
const pendingAfterAdmin = pairing.pending.filter(
|
||||
(entry) => entry.deviceId === identity.deviceId,
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(pendingAfterAdmin).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(pendingAfterAdmin[0]?.scopes ?? []).toEqual(
|
||||
expect.arrayContaining(["operator.read", "operator.admin"]),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(await getPairedDevice(identity.deviceId)).toBeNull();
|
||||
ws2.close();
|
||||
await server.close();
|
||||
@@ -1199,7 +1214,7 @@ describe("gateway server auth/connect", () => {
|
||||
restoreGatewayToken(prevToken);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("still requires node pairing while operator shared auth succeeds for the same device", async () => {
|
||||
test("merges remote node/operator pairing requests for the same unpaired device", async () => {
|
||||
const { mkdtemp } = await import("node:fs/promises");
|
||||
const { tmpdir } = await import("node:os");
|
||||
const { join } = await import("node:path");
|
||||
@@ -1266,23 +1281,25 @@ describe("gateway server auth/connect", () => {
|
||||
expect(nodeConnect.error?.message ?? "").toContain("pairing required");
|
||||
|
||||
const operatorConnect = await connectWithNonce("operator", ["operator.read", "operator.write"]);
|
||||
expect(operatorConnect.ok).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(operatorConnect.ok).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(operatorConnect.error?.message ?? "").toContain("pairing required");
|
||||
|
||||
const pending = await listDevicePairing();
|
||||
const pendingForTestDevice = pending.pending.filter(
|
||||
(entry) => entry.deviceId === identity.deviceId,
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(pendingForTestDevice).toHaveLength(1);
|
||||
expect(pendingForTestDevice[0]?.roles).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining(["node"]));
|
||||
expect(pendingForTestDevice[0]?.roles ?? []).not.toContain("operator");
|
||||
expect(pendingForTestDevice[0]?.roles).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining(["node", "operator"]));
|
||||
expect(pendingForTestDevice[0]?.scopes ?? []).toEqual(
|
||||
expect.arrayContaining(["operator.read", "operator.write"]),
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!pendingForTestDevice[0]) {
|
||||
throw new Error("expected pending pairing request");
|
||||
}
|
||||
await approveDevicePairing(pendingForTestDevice[0].requestId);
|
||||
|
||||
const paired = await getPairedDevice(identity.deviceId);
|
||||
expect(paired?.roles).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining(["node"]));
|
||||
expect(paired?.roles ?? []).not.toContain("operator");
|
||||
expect(paired?.roles).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining(["node", "operator"]));
|
||||
|
||||
const approvedOperatorConnect = await connectWithNonce("operator", ["operator.read"]);
|
||||
expect(approvedOperatorConnect.ok).toBe(true);
|
||||
@@ -1438,8 +1455,8 @@ describe("gateway server auth/connect", () => {
|
||||
expect(reconnect.ok).toBe(true);
|
||||
|
||||
const repaired = await getPairedDevice(deviceId);
|
||||
expect(repaired?.roles).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
expect(repaired?.scopes).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
expect(repaired?.roles ?? []).toContain("operator");
|
||||
expect(repaired?.scopes ?? []).toContain("operator.read");
|
||||
const list = await listDevicePairing();
|
||||
expect(list.pending.filter((entry) => entry.deviceId === deviceId)).toEqual([]);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
@@ -1450,7 +1467,7 @@ describe("gateway server auth/connect", () => {
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test("allows shared-auth scope escalation even when paired metadata is legacy-shaped", async () => {
|
||||
test("auto-approves local scope upgrades even when paired metadata is legacy-shaped", async () => {
|
||||
const { mkdtemp } = await import("node:fs/promises");
|
||||
const { tmpdir } = await import("node:os");
|
||||
const { join } = await import("node:path");
|
||||
@@ -1539,9 +1556,13 @@ describe("gateway server auth/connect", () => {
|
||||
expect(pendingUpgrade).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
const repaired = await getPairedDevice(identity.deviceId);
|
||||
expect(repaired?.role).toBe("operator");
|
||||
expect(repaired?.roles).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
expect(repaired?.scopes).toBeUndefined();
|
||||
expect(repaired?.approvedScopes).not.toContain("operator.admin");
|
||||
expect(repaired?.roles ?? []).toContain("operator");
|
||||
expect(repaired?.scopes ?? []).toEqual(
|
||||
expect.arrayContaining(["operator.read", "operator.admin"]),
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(repaired?.approvedScopes ?? []).toEqual(
|
||||
expect.arrayContaining(["operator.read", "operator.admin"]),
|
||||
);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
ws.close();
|
||||
ws2?.close();
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -565,18 +565,16 @@ export function attachGatewayWsMessageHandler(params: {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Shared token/password auth is already gateway-level trust for operator clients.
|
||||
// In that case, don't force device pairing on first connect.
|
||||
const skipPairingForOperatorSharedAuth =
|
||||
role === "operator" && sharedAuthOk && !isControlUi && !isWebchat;
|
||||
const trustedProxyAuthOk =
|
||||
isControlUi &&
|
||||
resolvedAuth.mode === "trusted-proxy" &&
|
||||
authOk &&
|
||||
authMethod === "trusted-proxy";
|
||||
const skipPairing =
|
||||
shouldSkipControlUiPairing(controlUiAuthPolicy, sharedAuthOk, trustedProxyAuthOk) ||
|
||||
skipPairingForOperatorSharedAuth;
|
||||
const skipPairing = shouldSkipControlUiPairing(
|
||||
controlUiAuthPolicy,
|
||||
sharedAuthOk,
|
||||
trustedProxyAuthOk,
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (device && devicePublicKey && !skipPairing) {
|
||||
const formatAuditList = (items: string[] | undefined): string => {
|
||||
if (!items || items.length === 0) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user